Friday, 12 September 2014
Response to Cultural Marxist 'Arguments' #1
The Cultural Marxists are well schooled in the Alinskyite tactics outlined in Rules for Radicals. They will try and mock you, isolate you, and repeat the same slogans and words repeatedly. To counter the mentally unstable ethno-masochists you simply have to point out the contradictions in their arguments. The leftist argument is based on falsehood, expose it with facts and their argument will fall apart.
One of the main leftist arguments in Britain is that 'we are a nation of immigrants.'
Here is an excellent counter argument that people can use to deconstruct and expose the leftist argument for what it is.
WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS
WRONG: Recent gene surveys found that even in England, if you can trace your family back to being here pre-1950, your genetic make up is likely to be an average of 75% post ice age settler. In other words we are related to the people who came here first after the last great ice age. Indeed in Somerset the DNA of 'Cheddar man' was tested and it was found he was related to several people in the local area and one man nearby was directly related to him.
YES BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ANGLO-SAXONS, VIKINGS AND NORMANS?
The DNA survey has found that they do not account for more than 5% of our genetic make up. We have another 10% Germannic but that is over 10k years old so is a long way pre 'dark age' and probably from the time when the continent was linked to the UK and before the channel flooded.
SO YOU ADMIT THAT YOU ARE AT LEAST PARTLY 'IMMIGRANTS'.ANSWER
NO. Listen to yourself. You are so desperate to suggest that we are a nation of immigrants that you are saying that we are immigrants because (wait for it)... white Europeans 'immigrated' to... White Europe! Added to that, the English are a mix of Viking, Anglo-Saxon, 'Celt' and Norman. All white Europeans. The nation of England was not formed until the Viking and Anglo-Saxon invasions were complete. So the English cannot be immigrants as you cannot 'immigrate' to a country that does not yet exist. Same for the 'British'. The Acts of Union were not passed until 1800 and 1801, so again, the British cannot 'immigrate' to a country that does not yet exist. Anybody who had family here before that cannot be an immigrant.
BUT EVERYONE CAME FROM AFRICAANSWER
WRONG. That theory died a death with the advent of DNA testing. We now know that white Cuacasians and Cinasians originated in the Caucasus. Africans contain completely different DNA from as yet unknown hominids. They originated in West Africa. We are so genetically different that in any other life form we would be considered a separate species.
BUT SURELY WE ARE ALL THE SAME?
WRONG. We are very different. And forgive me for mentioning, but don't you keep telling us we should celebrate 'diversity'? Now you are saying it does not exist! Nature favours diversity. It created races for a reason. The planned execution of racial mixing is an unnatural process. I am the champion of diversity. You want to destroy it.
THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE, THE HUMAN RACE.
WRONG. Any geneticist or biologist will tell you, humans are a species (maybe more than one) and certainly not a race.
BUT WE BELIEVE IN 'EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY'.
Good. Explain why it is then that 'equality' means we are all the same, but 'diversity' means we are all different. 'Equality and diversity' is an oxymoron. You can have one OR the other. The two cannot exist together. When you chant your slogans, do you not think about what your are chanting?
BUT THE VIKINGS AND ANGLO-SAXONS PROVE THAT IMMIGRATION IS NORMAL(He is trying to avoid dealing with the last VERY embarrassing point)
WRONG. The Vikings, Anglo-Saxons and Normans were certainly not immigrants. Firstly we have already established that to be the case. Their culture and genetic make up was almost identical to the host population. So much so that they integrated immediately. Vikings and Anglo-Saxons even spoke the same (dialectically different) language. Vikings, Anglo Saxons and Normans were all recently historically related. Vikings were Anglo-Saxons that migrated north before crossing the North Sea. Normans were Vikings that then migrated to France before crossing the channel. Secondly, another reason they were not immigrants is that they were 'invaders' and openly acknowledged themselves as such. They did not come in, demand passports and get paid benefits. Immigration is not normal at all. Thirdly, as already established, Europeans do not 'immigrate' to Europe. Fourthly, immigration is not normal and has never been accepted as such. An example of this is QE1's 'Expulsion of the Blackamore's' Order. Yes in the Elizabethan period it was found that there may be 'some' (as many as ten!) 'Blackamore's' (non white) people in the country. This caused alarm and the order was made for all to be expelled. Also have a quick read of Magna Carta. See what it says about foreigners.
BUT SURELY WITHOUT IMMIGRATION WE WILL ALL BECOME INBRED?
WRONG. Britain's biggest cause of inbreeding birth defects is the immigrant population. Many immigrant communities carry out first cousin marriages. Island populations such as the UK, Japan and Iceland are classic examples of how island communities advance faster than those exposed to greater population movement. Iceland, Japan and the indigenous Britons before 1950 had the lowest birth defects per head of population in the world. The reason being that a population that marries between six and eighteen stations of it's own immediate family actually produces less birth defects as it has the most compatible genes. Another example is the very high rate of birth defects in mixed race marriages. And it is also interesting that you are attempting to justify racial policies on the basis of eugenics. Aren't you meant to be against eugenics?
BUT LOOK AT THE BENEFITS. CURRY AND RAP MUSIC!
WOW.... Curry and Rap music. So even if you like either of both, are you suggesting that you have to import 6 million people in the space of a decade in order to get these 'benefits'! So we can get the same 'benefits' if we import a cookbook and some CDs? Rather than a programme of mass immigration costing the taxpayer billions a year we could have asked a couple of holidaymakers to bring back a souvenir each. Using your flawed logic it would mean that we would not have been able to object to the German invasion in 1940 if people had realised we like lager and the occasional sausage....
BUT WE ALL CAME FROM SOMEWHERE.
YOU ARE RIGHT. All life came from the sea. Are you seriously suggesting that we should mate with fish? Perhaps you would like to adopt a shrimp, give it social housing and and pay it some benefits? Then indoctrinate your children about how they should feel guilty about the way aqua bottom feeders are only that way because of the 'racism' of the evil 'white' people.