ShareThis

Wednesday, 31 December 2014

Jewish hatred of Christianity and the White European People


We have always said that if people want to fully understand the ethnic and religious motivation behind Cultural Marxism then they have to acknowledge that Christianity is one of the main targets. You don't have to be a Christian to understand this, but you do have to understand why Christianity is targeted. The Jewish ethnic and religious motivation to undermine and deconstruct Western civilisation is due to historical resentment, hatred and fear of the European people and Christianity.

They see Western civilisation and Christianity in particular, as being one long history of Jewish suffering. Of course they never ask the question why Jews have been pushed out of one nation after another, they put it down to a pathological genetic and illogical hatred of Jews for no reason whatsoever and even try and pass this off as scientific fact. If every time you went somewhere you got beaten up because of your actions, wouldn't you stop and say to yourself that maybe my behaviour is what is leading to me being attacked rather than blaming those who were attacking you. If your behaviour was the problem, then denying it and blaming others is not only exacerbating the problem, but it is a sure sign of a real pathology.

Cultural Marxism which has its roots in the Jewish led intellectual movements of the Frankfurt School, focused on what they perceived to be the Christian foundations of Western civilisation, the family being one of the most important. The family was for the most part raised and centred around Christian values, education, traditions and morality. If the family could be broken up and Christianity undermined, then the benefits of this to Jews were massive. It is also why they pushed for secular nations and a separation of church and state. It is why they have been behind the promotion of homosexuality, feminism, pornography and all other subversive movements to attack the Western family. It is all geared towards ending what they call 'anti-semitism,' but which is in reality a method to remove their biggest opposition so that they can operate freely without the threat of a European awakening. They want domination and control to benefit themselves and will do whatever it takes to achieve it.

Christianity has been infiltrated and turned against itself, it has now become part of the problem. The march of universalist egalitarianism is a common feature of Christianity today. In essence Christianity has become an internationalist one worldist religion which does not recognise the right of Europeans to live as Europeans in their own part of the world. This isn't an attack on Christianity, it is merely stating the obvious which many Nationalist Christians also acknowledge.

The Jewish intellectuals of the Frankfurt School were focused on explaining 'anti-semitism' as being a result of the Western family based on Christian teachings. They also saw it as being a genetic European trait, they said that fascism and nationalism were born out of the Christian authoritarian patriarchal family set up, and that children were moulded to accept authority hence the rise of Fascism and National Socialism. Again, they never put any blame on themselves for hostility towards them, it was always the fault of somebody else. They also never mentioned the patriarchal and ethnocentric Jewish world, that was off limits and strangely would also be labeled as 'anti-semitism' if it were to be raised by a non-Jew.

These ideas were espoused in a book called the 'Authoritarian Personality' written by Theodore Adorno a Jewish member of the Frankfurt School committed to ending 'anti-semitism.' This book specifically targeted the Western family describing it as a micro fascist institution that led to the emergence of Fascism as a National movement which was, they said, 'anti-semitic.' They also attempted to describe the Western family as a psychopathology. Everything we identify today as being anti-family has its roots in this book. It should come as no surprise to learn that the book was sponsored by the 'American Jewish Committee,' this book is a manifesto of ethnic and cultural warfare against the European people written and sponsored by an out group intent on advancing their own specific group interests.

The Frankfurt School post WWII was opposed to Western civilisation primarily because of this desire to end 'anti-semitism.' Initially its primary goal was to deconstruct Western civilisation because the people of the West had failed to embrace Communist revolution. This is still a motivating factor, but it expanded to include the ending of hostility to Jews as a hostile out group.

The rise of National Socialism in the 1930s which was an ideology advocating racial consciousness, pride and loyalty along with what is called 'Positive Christianity,' was the biggest threat in modern times to Jewish domination of a European nation. This is what led to the alliance of so called polar opposites as far as ideology is concerned, the worlds of Communism and Capitalism came together to defeat National Socialism and everything was done to destroy Germany and its people. Subsequently the racial consciousness of Europeans had to be destroyed via mass immigration to erode and weaken racial identity. The drumbeat of 'racism' became ever present to attack anybody who opposed this demographic attack upon the European people wherever they lived on the planet. Race denilaism, equality, Multiculturalism and diversity became methods in which to achieve the eradication of European racial awareness. Western institutions were infiltrated by Jewish academics who employed ethnic networking to get more Jews into influential positions who could then go on to push these pseudo-intellectual ideas not based on science or empirical study, but which were based on achieving a consensus amongst the Western elite and therefore Western civilisation as a whole based on emotional manipulation. Any academic or scientific findings that opposed the Jewish lies were shunned and labeled as 'racist' or 'anti-semitic.' Basically it is a mass censoring of all opposition views, another form of Marcusian Repressive Tolerance, ie no platform for alternative non-conformative views.

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

"The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country."

"We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever."

This ethnic and religious motivation to attack and subvert Christianity goes back to the Bolshevik revolution and the take over of Russia. Jews perceived Russia and Orthodox Christianity as being 'anti-semitic' so set about using Communist revolution to bring down the tsar. Millions of Russian Christians perished as a result. The fact that it was an exclusively Jewish led takeover can be seen in the cooperation between Jewish communists and Jewish capitalist bankers who funded the Bolshevik revolution. Cultural Marxism is merely an outgrowth of this, but uses subversion rather than the gulag and bullet to achieve its aims.

Ivan Aksakov, a leader of Slavophiles in Russia, viewed Jews as a competitive threat intent on destroying Christianity:

'The Western European Christian world will be faced in the future, in one form or another, with a life-and-death struggle with Jewry, which is striving to replace the universal Christian ideal by another, Semitic ideal, also universal, but negative and anti-Christian.'

The following quote shows how at its core the Jewish assault on the West is born out of a deep rooted hatred and fear of Christianity aswel as the European people.

"The Jews emerged from the Middle Ages knowing for a certainty that—individual exceptions duly noted—the worst enemy they had in the world was Christianity: the churches in which it was embodied—whether Roman Catholic or Russian Orthodox or Protestant—and the people who prayed in and were shaped by them. It was a knowledge that Jewish experience in the ages to come would do very little, if indeed anything at all, to help future generations to forget."

- Why Are Jews Liberals? By Norman Podhoretz.

It is this view held by Jews that leads to them supporting all things that negatively impact upon the West whether it be mass non-European immigration, Gay rights, feminism etc. It is as Dr Kevin MacDonald describes it a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy' which is born out of the Jewish intellectual movements of the 20th century Frankfurt School.

The goal is simple, transform Europe and the West into a Jewish construct leading to Jewish ethnic dominance free of European racial awareness, national identity and religious affiliation. It has taken many decades to achieve, but if you look at the West today and are wise to the strategies that have made it what it is, then you will see how successful they have been.

You can also see how hypocrisy is rife in this Jewish Anti-Western, Anti-White and Anti-Christian worldview, as Jews are the most ethnocentric people you could come across. Israel is an exclusively Jewish state that forbids intermarriage and any form of non-Jewish immigration. They oppose gay marriage and have a strong sense of the importance of the Jewish family. All this whilst they support the exact opposite for Europeans in Western nations, and have been at the forefront of promoting for Westerners what they reject for themselves as Jews.

Much of what has happened to the West would not have been possible if it were not for the propagandising of a pivotal 'event' that could be used as a stick to beat Europeans with upon any display of racial, national and cultural pride and awareness.

The Jewish story of persecution throughout the ages at the hands of Europeans and Christians culminating in the so called 'Holocaust,' has become the 'moral justification' for the destruction of Europeans and their ancestral homelands. Any form of nationalistic sentiment is immediately attacked and denounced as 'nazism.' The idea being that nationalism can be stopped by constantly referring to the 'Holocaust' which keeps people from embracing nationalist ideas due to the official 'Holocaust' narrative and the specter of evil that has been attached to it and repeatedly enforced via Hollywood propaganda and education.

Cultural Marxism is the equivalent of poisoning a healthy water supply, it eventually comes to infect everyone with the poison. It is the sabotage of European identity and is a tumour yet to be identified as an abnormal growth within Western civilisation.

The most important thing to know about Cultural Marxism is that it is not a natural phenomena or a natural transition of the thought process of Westerners. It is a deeply hateful, subversive and manipulative ideology employed by a small group of Jewish pseudo-intellectuals and planted into the cultural institutions of the West. From here it has grown like a virus and has come to be pushed by the very people it was intended to destroy. It has been dressed up in words that do not reveal its true intentions. Words like tolerance, enrichment, love, equality and diversity.

The only way to defeat it is to understand that it is designed by a hostile out group to divide and conquer an in group specifically for the benefit of the out group.

Saturday, 27 December 2014

Jewish Involvement In Black Slave Trade To The Americas

By Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael

 
The following passages are from Dr. Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.
 
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
 
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
 
Dr. Raphael discusses the central role of the Jews in the New World commerce and the African slave trade (pp. 23-25):
 
SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES JEWISH INTER-ISLAND TRADE: CURACAO, 1656
 
During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled husinessmen.
 
While thriving in Amsterdam - where they became the hub of a unique urban Jewish universe and attained status that anticipated Jewish emancipation in the West by over a century - they began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English).
 
In these European outposts the Jews, with their years of mercantile experience and networks of friends and family providing market reports of great use, played a significant role in the merchant capitalism, commercial revolution, and territorial expansion that developed the New World and established the colonial economies. The Jewish-Caribbean nexus provided Jews with the opportunity to claim a disproportionate influence in seventeenth and eighteenth century New World commerce, and enabled West Indian Jewry-far outnumbering its coreligionists further north-to enjoy a centrality which North American Jewry would not achieve for a long time to come.
 
Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seven-teenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.
 
Slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which as a major stopping-off point in the triangular trade. Both North American and Caribbean Jews played a key role in this commerce: records of a slave sale in 1707 reveal that the ten largest Jewish purchasers (10,400 guilders) spent more than 25 percent of the total funds (38,605 guilders) exchanged.
 
Jewish economic life in the Dutch West Indies, as in the North American colonies, consisted primarily of mercantile communities, with large inequities in the distribution of wealth. Most Jews were shopkeepers, middlemen, or petty merchants who received encouragement and support from Dutch authorities. In Curacao, for example, Jewish communal life began after the Portuguese victory in 1654.
 
In 1656, the community founded a congregation, and in the early 1670's brought its first rabbi to the island. Curacao, with its large natural harbor, was the steppng-stone to the other Caribbean islands and thus ideally suited geographically for commerce.
 
The Jews were the recipients of favorable charters containing generous economic privileges granted by the Dutch West Indies Company in Amsterdam. The economic life of the Jewish community of Curacao revolved around ownership of sugar plantations and marketing of sugar, the importing of manufactured goods, and a heavy involvement in the slave trade, within a decade of their arrival, Jews owned 80 percent of the Curacao plantations. The strength of the Jewish trade lay in connections in Western Europe as well as ownership of the ships used in commerce. While Jews carried on an active trade with French and English colonies in the Caribbean, their principal market was the Spanish Main (today Venezuela and Colombia).
 
Extant tax lists give us a glimpse of their dominance. Of the eighteen wealthiest Jews in the 1702 and 1707 tax lists, nine either owned a ship or had at least a share in a vessel. By 1721 a letter to the Amsterdam Jewish community claimed that "nearly all the navigation...was in the hands of the Jews."' Yet another indication of the economic success of Curacao's Jews is the fact that in 1707 the island's 377 residents were assessed by the Governor and his Council a total of 4,002 pesos; 104 Jews, or 27.6 percent of the taxpayers, contributed 1,380 pesos, or 34.5 percent of the entire amount assessed.
 
In the British West Indies, two 1680 tax lists survive, both from Barbados; they, too, provide useful information about Jewish economic life. In Bridgetown itself, out of a total of 404 households, 54 households or 300 persons were Jewish, 240 of them living in "ye Towne of S. Michael ye Bridge Town." Contrary to most impressions, "many, indeed, most of them, were very poor." There were only a few planters, and most Jews were not naturalized or endenizened (and thus could not import goods or pursue debtors in court). But for merchants holding letters of endenization, opportunities were not lacking. Barbados sugar-and its by-products rum and molasses-were in great demand, and in addition to playing a role in its export, Jewish merchants were active in the import trade.
 
Forty-five Jewish households were taxed in Barbados in 1680, and more than half of them contributed only 11.7 percent of the total sum raised. While the richest five gave almost half the Jewish total, they were but 11.1 percent of the taxable population. The tax list of 1679-80 shows a similar picture; of fifty-one householders, nineteen (37.2 percent) gave less than one-tenth of the total, while the four richest merchants gave almost one-third of the total.
 
An interesting record of interisland trade involving a Jewish merchant and the islands of Barbados and Curacao comes from correspondence of 1656. It reminds us that sometimes the commercial trips were not well planned and that Jewish captains - who frequently acted as commercial agents as well - would decide where to sell their cargo, at what price, and what goods to bring back on the return trip.
 
(End of excerpt)
 
 
Tony Martin is African studies professor at Wellesley College and has taught at Wellesley College, Massachusetts since 1973. He was tenured in 1975 and has been a full professor of African Studies since 1979. Prior to coming to Wellesley he taught at the University of Michigan-Flint, the Cipriani Labour College (Trinidad) and St. Mary's College (Trinidad). He has been a visiting professor at the University of Minnesota, Brandeis University, Brown University and The Colorado College. He also spent a year as an honorary research fellow at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad.
 
Professor Martin has authored or compiled or edited eleven books, including Literary Garveyism: Garvey, Black Arts and the Harlem Renaissance, and the classic study of the Garvey Movement, Race First: the Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association.. His most recent book is The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront. Martin qualified as a barrister-at-law at the Honourable Society of Gray's Inn (London) in 1965, did a B. Sc. honours degree in economics at the University of Hull (England) and the M.A. and Ph.D. in history at Michigan State University.
 
Martin's articles and reviews have appeared in the Journal of Negro History, American Historical Review, African Studies Review, Washington Post Book World, Journal of Caribbean History, Journal of American History, Black Books Bulletin, Science and Society, Jamaica Journal and many other places. His work is to be found in several anthologies and encyclopedias. He has received a number of academic and community awards.
 
Martin is well known as a lecturer in many countries. He has spoken to university and general audiences all over the United States, Canada, the Caribbean and England, and also in Africa, Australia, Bermuda and South America. In 1990 he delivered the annual DuBois/Padmore/Nkrumah lectures in Ghana.
 
Professor Martin is currently working on biographies of three Caribbean women - Amy Ashwood Garvey, Audrey Jeffers and Trinidad's Kathleen Davis ("Auntie Kay"). He is also nearing completion of a study of European Jewish immigration into Trinidad in the 1930s.
 
 
The Jewish Onslaught
Despatches From The Wellesley Battlefront
By Tony Martin
 
"...a polemic of the highest order... the best example of an African answering critics since David Walker's Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World." - Molefi Asante, Journal Of Black Studies
 
"Professor Martin at long last deals with the Henry Gates/Cornel West attacks on Afrocentricity.... Martin provides a solid analysis of the historical use of Blacks by whites to discredit original Black thought deemed unacceptable by non-Blacks....
 
"I compare The Jewish Onslaught to the classic third chapter of DuBois' The Souls of Black Folk entitled 'Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others....' Martin has written a book that years from now will be considered a classic.... It is simply a must reading on a controversial subject that needs greater airing than some of the more timid political attempts of recent years." - Raymond Winbush, The Voice Of Black Studies
 
" Tony Martin has been forced to delve into the relationship between the Jews and Blacks and in the process, he has distilled a work that is informative, fascinating and one which will heighten the consciousness of Black people everywhere." - Carl Wint, The Sunday Gleaner
 
#1 Bestseller
(Your Black Books Guide)
 
Best Book Of The Year
(Black Literary Awards, 1994)
1993. vii+137pp. ISBN 0-912469-30-7.
 
Subject: Who owned the slaving ships?
 
 
 
Name Of Slave Ships And Their Owners:
 
The 'Abigail-Caracoa' - Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Crown
Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson
 
The'Nassau' - Moses Levy
 
The 'Four Sisters' - Moses Levy
 
The 'Anne' & The 'Eliza' - Justus Bosch and John Abrams
 
The 'Prudent Betty' - Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
 
The 'Hester' - Mordecai and David Gomez
 
The 'Elizabeth' - Mordecai and David Gomez
 
The 'Antigua' - Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell
 
The 'Betsy' - Wm. De Woolf
 
The 'Polly' - James De Woolf
 
The 'White Horse' - Jan de Sweevts
 
The 'Expedition' - John and Jacob Roosevelt
 
The 'Charlotte' - Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks
 
The 'Franks' - Moses and Sam Levy
 
 
A video, "The Jewish Role in the Black Slave Trade," a speech by Prof. Tony Martin with an introduction by Hoffman, remains online at Google, as of this writing. Viewers who wish to see it before it, too is censored by Google, can access it here:
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3435039175602962781

Source

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...