Sunday, 11 January 2015

Jewish 'Guards' on Patrol in London.

What would you say if I told you that the metropolitan police worked in conjunction with a security firm that looked out for the interests of whites in London? That they received police training and were allowed to drive vehicles around London that looked like police vehicles, and had the words 'white gurards' on the side? You would no doubt laugh and scoff at such a suggestion, and you would be right to do so, because such a thing would never be allowed.

What about Jews?

Funny you should mention that, because Jews are allowed such an organisation. Jews are allowed guards who receive police training and are allowed to drive around in vehicles that resemble police vehicles with the word 'Shomrim' emblazoned on the side which means 'guards' in Hebrew.

People have rightly been outraged at the spread of Muslim patrols which have tried to enforce Sharia law on the streets of Europe. The media and politicians and police criticised Christian and Nationalist patrols that grew in response. Yet a Jewish patrol is perfectly acceptable and even receives police training.

If this were a white defence patrol there would be absolute uproar in the kosher press. There would be headlines about 'nazi patrols,' the leftist morons would be up in arms demanding they be banned and people involved put in prison. The police would raid homes and harass anybody associated with them. The government would speak about 'removing racist gangs off thr streets.'

The hypocrisy and double standards are nauseatingly predictable.

Saturday, 3 January 2015


   THE POWDER KEG OF DENIAL                  

In 1950, UNESCO declared that race does not exist, that it is a myth. This came after the subversion of the social sciences by the entrance of large numbers of Jews into the field. Franz Boas, and Claude Lévi-Strauss among many others, became very influential, Boas rejected race, but his stance and work was far from empirical, it was little more than critique, a self-serving theory. “Lévi-Strauss’s writings were aimed at enshrining cultural differences and subverting universalism of the West, a position that validated the position of Judaism as a non-assimilating group. Like Boas, Lévi-Strauss rejected biological and evolutionary theories.”  Boas became the so-called father of American anthropology, his disciples went on to found anthropology departments in universities all over the country, and with them, the pseudo-science of race denial was taught to generations of students, all while physical anthropologists are teaching how to identify the race of a person from their remains. It is almost laughable, if it were not so serious. “In sociology, the advent of Jewish intellectuals in the pre-World War 2 period resulted in “a level of politicization unknown to sociology’s founding fathers.” Marx replaced Darwin. These Jews held all other theories to rigorous empirical standards, while holding their own theories to no standard of evidence at all. This method has become the status quo for all leftist arguments and movements that are the many tentacles of Cultural Marxism.           Here we will take a look at IQ, as just one aspect of the clear differences between races of men, with focus on the Black and White differences, and why it matters.    

The differences in IQ between Blacks and Whites is attacked in the same way leftist intellectuals attack everything else they don’t like, they demand rigorous empirical standards while holding themselves to no standards at all. It is attacked from an ideological perspective, and not a scientific one, when the empirical standards are repeatedly met, they simply call it “racist” and end the conversation. IQ is sound science, no matter how much it is denied, the correlation between IQ and outcomes in a number of areas is well established. If IQ was faulty, then performance would not be in line with scores, but performance and outcomes are in line with scores, regardless of socio economic standing or other environmental conditions.  

The largest and most rigorous studies on IQ show a standard deviation of 1.21 between Blacks and Whites, with a Black mean of about 85, and a White mean of about 100. “It is important to understand as well that a difference of 1.2 standard deviations means considerable overlap in cognitive ability distribution for blacks and whites…”  This considerable overlap occurs on the low side of the White mean, and the high side of the Black mean. Black IQ distribution above the White mean of 100 is very low compared to the distribution between 80 and 90. “At the lower end of the IQ range, there are approximately equal numbers of blacks and whites. But throughout the upper half of the range, the disproportions between the number of whites and blacks at any given IQ level are huge. To the extent that the difference represents an authentic difference in cognitive functioning, the social consequences are potentially huge as well.”    

Let’s take a look at just a couple of areas where IQ has shown its importance.  Much attention is given to Black-White unemployment rates in the US, we will add Latinos here because they are represented in the data available. After controlling for an IQ of 100, the unemployment difference for Blacks shrinks by more than half. The Latino, White difference disappears completely, and the White rate actually rises 1% point.     Controlling for IQ of 100 cuts the poverty differential by 77% for Blacks, and 74% for Latinos. Whites in poverty with a IQ of 100 come in at 6%, Blacks 11%, Latinos 9%. This compared to the 7% White, 26% Black, 18% Latino in the general US population.  Controlling for an IQ of 100, cuts the Black-White disparity in low birth weight babies by half. Controlling for IQ reduces the discrepancy between White and minority children living In poverty by more than 80%.  Controlling for IQ more than eliminates overall ethnic differences in developmental indexes. Controlling for IQ cuts Black-White difference in incarceration rates by three quarters. Controlling for IQ cuts the gap in Black-White welfare rates by half, and the Latino-White gap by 84%. When controlling for IQ of 100, Blacks and Latinos are more likely than Whites to get a college degree and end up in a high paying job. (Affirmative Action at work)    We can see that clearly, IQ matters. IQ differences between Blacks and Whites matter. We also know that many Blacks are at the high end of the cognitive classes, cognitive classes being Very Dull, Dull, Normal, Bright, and Very Bright. The discrepancy is in the numbers and averages. While the majority of Whites fall into the Normal class, with a much larger distribution in the Bright and Very Bright classes than their distribution in the Dull and very Dull classes, Blacks are just the opposite. The majority of blacks fall into the Dull class with a large number in the Very Dull class, Black representation in IQ distribution starts to fall sharply when it hits the Normal range (90-110) and even more sharply when it hits the White mean of 100. It continues to drop drastically until the gap between the differences in the percentage of Whites and Blacks in the high end of the Normal, Bright and Very Bright classes is absolutely huge.    

We can see the realities of IQ clearly in the differences in development and standards of Europe and European diaspora Nations and communities throughout the world, compared to Black African Nations and communities throughout the world. As well as the difference between Asian and Black African nations and communities throughout the world. East Asians have a slightly higher mean than Whites, though not nearly as large as the standard deviations between Blacks and Whites.    

The Blacks who are at the Normal and above classes of cognitive ability are simply to few to carry the majority of their population that fall into the Dull and Very Dull classes, and their Nations and communities show this repeatedly. At the same time, Whites whose majorities fall into the Normal and above classes are able to cope with and carry the much smaller percentages of their population that fall into the Dull and Very Dull classes. Again, this is seen manifest in European, and European derived populations throughout the globe.  

The consequences of ignoring racial realities are dire. Resentment will continue to grow from both those who cannot understand their inability to succeed in Western Nations, and the Western people who created those Nations resentment at having to constantly pull the weight of others not of their blood who not only do not appreciate it, but resent them for it, with incessant cries of racism and oppression.  We are quickly reaching the tipping point where the burden of carrying the weight of the Black underclass will become to great a task, and one that is simply not worth the Lefts promised rewards that never have, and never will come, because they are ideologically, and not organically driven. Race denial is a powder keg, the fuse is resentment that will lead to the inevitable explosion of conflict and suffering for all.   -7  

( The Bell Curve, Herrnstein & Murray 1994)              
( The Culture of Critique, MacDonald 1998)                                            

White Nationalism - European Unity over Multiracial Diversity

I come across a lot of negativity in relation to the term 'White Nationalism,' it appears that some people don't seem to fully understand what it means.

White Nationalism in my view, is not necessarily about abandoning national identity in favour of racial identity.

Many WN's believe in ORION (Our race is our nation), but this is not born out of a wish to see an end to the nation state, many WN's also believe in Race and Nation.

If anything, White Nationalism is more a realisation that at present, the nation states of Europe are controlled by anti-white traitors at their core, who are doing everything possible to destroy historically white homelands via Mass Immigration. When you look at it this way and see that undeniable reality, I don't see why racial loyalty over national loyalty is perceived by some to be a bad thing.

The term White Nationalism basically means you are a Nationalist who believes in a homeland for your own racial kin, the nation once was this homeland, but is now under severe threat. White Nationalism isn't anti nation state, it seeks a nation or homeland for our people.

Obviously the preferred outcome for all white nationalists would be to have independent homogenous nation states which are racially aware, and not hell bent on destroying the ethnic and cultural make up of nations, however we are a million miles away from that.

I am British, I consider myself to be a British Ethno-Nationalist, but I am also a racial nationalist and therefore a white nationalist. I acknowledge that Britain today is not a place where my ethnic and racial group has a future, unless there is drastic change then the future of the indigenous British people is bleak.

When I say a future, I mean the indigenous British people having a nation to call their own that looks out for their interests as an ethnic group, a nation in which they are the ethnic majority and continue to be so. This isn't the case today and hasn't been for some time, Britain and many other Western European nations are being socially and demographically engineered into multiracial states in which the indigenous population will lose their majority status. Those ruling Britain today see it as a multicultural nation, or in real terms they see Britain as a multiracial nation, in which there is no indigenous population with interests specific to them. The ruling political class have NO intention of ensuring the future of the British Isles as a European homeland for the indigenous British people.

Those who rule over and control Britain are committed to its racial and cultural downfall, how can I have loyalty to that? It doesn't mean I hate Britain or its history, how could I ever hate the homeland of my ancestors? I couldn't. That doesn't stop me understanding that the Britain of 2014 is not really Britain at all. What will it be like in 2050, 2060? What will be the plight of the minority indigenous British population in which I may have children and grandchildren? Would I put race ahead of nation at this point, yes I would, but with a heavy heart.

I would love nothing more than to see a national rebirth based on racial and cultural awareness and consciousness, but the likelihood is that even if it does happen it will possibly be to late. What then?

When we apply this to Western Europe as a whole, then there may well come a time in the future when the national identity we once held dear is but a distant memory. White Europeans may have no other choice than to come together to create a new homeland, and I believe that WN's are aware of this and do not have faith in the direction our people and nations are headed at the present time.

White Nationalism has been labeled as 'internationalism,' but in the negative Communistic sense. The crucial difference here is that White Nationalism is based on racial preservation and not Communsitic internationalism which wants to mix all races and eradicate all national borders to rule over all of mankind with the brutality associated with Communism. White internationalism if that is what some choose to call it, is not the same as Communsitic one worldism that despises and pursues the eradication of nations and national boundaries. White Nationalism doesn't want an end to the nation, it simply sees no other alternative to the current onslaught against whites wherever they may be in the world.

White Nationalists, would be the ultimate internationalists if the Nation state were under their control, they would certainly trade with their European brothers in other nations, they would certainly cooperate with each other and work together to benefit all Europeans in their own homelands. If you want to call that internationalism then go ahead, but please don't attach the negative Communistic internationalist label to it. They are not the same thing and never will be.

If you were to ask the majority of WN's, I believe they would tell you that far from being anti nation state, they are merely accepting of the fact that the future of our people in the nation states as they are today, is simply not going to be realistically viable in the future.

Any so called Ethno-Nationalist who is happy to see their nation go down the diversity toilet just so long as they retain their 'national' identity, is not really an Ethno-Nationalist at all. Only civic nationalists who are not really nationalists but pro multiculturalists, would be happy to see a racially different nation so long as the national flag continued to fly from government buildings. This doesn't help our people, it aids their displacement. Civic nationalists wouldn't mind one bit to see a non-white prime minister, so long as he said all the right things about Britain and spoke with an Eton accent.

Culture is a racial construct, and when the original race disappears as the majority, the culture goes with them. The flying of the Union Jack over Britain in the future, in which the indigenous British people are a minority means what exactly? It means nothing. It becomes worthless, for it no longer is Britain in the truest sense. The most important marker of a European nation is its people not its flag. The flag only means something when the indigenous people are flying it as the vanguard of their national boundaries.

Anyone who attacks white nationalism is attacking possibly the only option left for our people as a racial group in the future. Politics has been a complete and utter failure for Nationalism in Europe, the evidence for this is the visual reality of Europe today. Each individual Western European nation is declining more and more each day, and despite a rise in nationalistic sentiment, we are nowhere near a viable alternative to the anti-white multiracial agenda running rampant through our homelands.

If in 30/40 years our children and grandchildren decide to move to a new homeland created by their racial brothers and sisters, then would anybody blame them for going  after the abject failure to protect their future in their own homelands? I wouldn't blame them, I would encourage them to leave the cesspit they inherited in an instant. They wouldn't be traitors for deserting the long since gone nation state with a totally alien identity.  If anything they will be victims of our failings. Would you blame a white family for moving out of London to a white area because they were the only white family in the area of London in which they lived? I wouldn't, I would offer them a room and a place at my table if I could.

Another common argument by the civic nationalists and the anti WNs is that due to EU immigration, white Genocide isn't happening.  They say it is a myth because hundreds of thousands of Eastern Europeans are heading to Western Europe. This is ludicrous. The damage was already done way before EU immigration began on the scale it is today. London in the UK is now majority non-white, Birmingham, Leicester and Luton are also very near to this depressing state. Many of our towns up and down the country are being Islamified before our very eyes. Yes Eastern European immigration brings its own issues added to that of mass third world immigration, but it is in no way a valid argument to suggest that White Genocide is not happening. Most if not all EU migrants would head home tomorrow if Britain were to leave the EU, however the masses of third world immigrants and their descendents would still be here having been granted citizenship status. Whites would still be heading for minority status. Third world immigration will continue regardless of whether we leave the EU or not. It is this that is the primary problem for the future of our nation.

That doesn't mean we ignore EU immigration, it simply means that aswel as doing everything possible to leave the EU, we don't lose sight of the bigger picture which is mass third world immigration and the impact it is having on the future demographic make up of our nations. Nobody in Britain for example who is a British Ethno-Nationalist has anything in common with a Polish nationalist who hates Britain or who doesn't care about the future of Britain. A Polish Nationalist in Britain voting for Labour because they support them being here, is not a Nationalist any Brit would want to know, support or associate with.

In terms of the bigger picture, if whites across Western and Eastern Europe have to at some point in the future come together as a result of our failings today, then so be it. Once our nations have been irreprebly lost to Communistic one worldism of all races and cultures, then we will have nothing left but to unite as Europeans in defence of our race in a time when the nations we once knew are long gone. If European nations can be saved then great, but hand on heart, how many of you can say that this is going to happen?

The white race is already divided enough as it is, a great majority of our people have been poisoned by Cultural Marxist propaganda to hate not only themselves, but their nations, their history and culture. Then we have whites divided along religious lines, whether it be Catholic and Protestant, Christian and Pagan. Russian and Ukrainian hostility is another example. Our people are even fighting and killing each other every weekend in our towns and cities as they consume huge amounts of alcohol designed to keep them in a semi permanent drunken state. So I don't see further division as being productive in any way whatsoever, and certainly not an aggressive approach against fellow Nationalist whites who for the most part agree on most issues.

Racial Nationalism is a crucial part of all Nationalism, without the racial continuity what does the nation become in the end? When the race has been targeted by the system for displacement and the attack is succeeding, then what?

Those who attack White Nationalism need to ask themselves a question, if you were stuck in a situation in which your life was endangered by the diversity foot soldiers, and a White Nationalist came to your aid, would you decline his help because you believe him to be a 'communist internationalist?' This stupid attack on White Nationalists is ridiculous and plays right into the hands of our enemies who hardly need to divide and conquer us when we do such a good job at doing it ourselves. They simply sit back laughing and rubbing their hands together.

As far as I am concerned, whites across Europe love their national identity, they have fought and died for it. I don’t believe that all WN's would want an end to the national identity in favour of racial unity across borders if we were not in the situation we find ourselves in today. White Nationalism is born out of  Nationalism, it is born out of a love for the blood and soil of ones ancestors. It is not an enemy of the National struggle, but a creation of it. The National struggle to a large extent has failed, look at your major towns and cities, if this is the future then are you really going to fight for this 'new National Identity' when those pulling the strings are actively working against you and have engineered you into a minority? Once the race no longer makes up the majority population then the Nation is finished. It is a conquered Nation with no room for sentiment, only the next logical step ie racial unity above all.

As Cicero said, "a Nation cannot survive treason from within," and it is true. How can the individual European nation states continue to be homelands for the indigenous European people when those running the nations are intent on their destruction? How can we be independent European nations when we are controlled by a centralised Globalist Marxist alliance in Brussels?

There is a way for us to regain control over the destiny of our people and nations, but time is fast running out. We are approaching that tipping point of no return, one thing I can guarantee though, is that white nationalists will be fighting against the traitors until the very end.

If you are white, love your nation, your continent and your people, then you are a white nationalist. Whether you are German, British, French, Dutch, American, Australian or Canadian, if you are proud of your race and nation and want to see it flourish in your ancestors image then you are a white nationalist.

There is nothing bad about the term, and I would seriously question the motives of those who seek to further divide the white race over something so trivial and unimportant, especially when they label white nationalists as 'Communist internationalists.'

Wednesday, 31 December 2014

Jewish hatred of Christianity and the White European People

We have always said that if people want to fully understand the ethnic and religious motivation behind Cultural Marxism then they have to acknowledge that Christianity is one of the main targets. You don't have to be a Christian to understand this, but you do have to understand why Christianity is targeted. The Jewish ethnic and religious motivation to undermine and deconstruct Western civilisation is due to historical resentment, hatred and fear of the European people and Christianity.

They see Western civilisation and Christianity in particular, as being one long history of Jewish suffering. Of course they never ask the question why Jews have been pushed out of one nation after another, they put it down to a pathological genetic and illogical hatred of Jews for no reason whatsoever and even try and pass this off as scientific fact. If every time you went somewhere you got beaten up because of your actions, wouldn't you stop and say to yourself that maybe my behaviour is what is leading to me being attacked rather than blaming those who were attacking you. If your behaviour was the problem, then denying it and blaming others is not only exacerbating the problem, but it is a sure sign of a real pathology.

Cultural Marxism which has its roots in the Jewish led intellectual movements of the Frankfurt School, focused on what they perceived to be the Christian foundations of Western civilisation, the family being one of the most important. The family was for the most part raised and centred around Christian values, education, traditions and morality. If the family could be broken up and Christianity undermined, then the benefits of this to Jews were massive. It is also why they pushed for secular nations and a separation of church and state. It is why they have been behind the promotion of homosexuality, feminism, pornography and all other subversive movements to attack the Western family. It is all geared towards ending what they call 'anti-semitism,' but which is in reality a method to remove their biggest opposition so that they can operate freely without the threat of a European awakening. They want domination and control to benefit themselves and will do whatever it takes to achieve it.

Christianity has been infiltrated and turned against itself, it has now become part of the problem. The march of universalist egalitarianism is a common feature of Christianity today. In essence Christianity has become an internationalist one worldist religion which does not recognise the right of Europeans to live as Europeans in their own part of the world. This isn't an attack on Christianity, it is merely stating the obvious which many Nationalist Christians also acknowledge.

The Jewish intellectuals of the Frankfurt School were focused on explaining 'anti-semitism' as being a result of the Western family based on Christian teachings. They also saw it as being a genetic European trait, they said that fascism and nationalism were born out of the Christian authoritarian patriarchal family set up, and that children were moulded to accept authority hence the rise of Fascism and National Socialism. Again, they never put any blame on themselves for hostility towards them, it was always the fault of somebody else. They also never mentioned the patriarchal and ethnocentric Jewish world, that was off limits and strangely would also be labeled as 'anti-semitism' if it were to be raised by a non-Jew.

These ideas were espoused in a book called the 'Authoritarian Personality' written by Theodore Adorno a Jewish member of the Frankfurt School committed to ending 'anti-semitism.' This book specifically targeted the Western family describing it as a micro fascist institution that led to the emergence of Fascism as a National movement which was, they said, 'anti-semitic.' They also attempted to describe the Western family as a psychopathology. Everything we identify today as being anti-family has its roots in this book. It should come as no surprise to learn that the book was sponsored by the 'American Jewish Committee,' this book is a manifesto of ethnic and cultural warfare against the European people written and sponsored by an out group intent on advancing their own specific group interests.

The Frankfurt School post WWII was opposed to Western civilisation primarily because of this desire to end 'anti-semitism.' Initially its primary goal was to deconstruct Western civilisation because the people of the West had failed to embrace Communist revolution. This is still a motivating factor, but it expanded to include the ending of hostility to Jews as a hostile out group.

The rise of National Socialism in the 1930s which was an ideology advocating racial consciousness, pride and loyalty along with what is called 'Positive Christianity,' was the biggest threat in modern times to Jewish domination of a European nation. This is what led to the alliance of so called polar opposites as far as ideology is concerned, the worlds of Communism and Capitalism came together to defeat National Socialism and everything was done to destroy Germany and its people. Subsequently the racial consciousness of Europeans had to be destroyed via mass immigration to erode and weaken racial identity. The drumbeat of 'racism' became ever present to attack anybody who opposed this demographic attack upon the European people wherever they lived on the planet. Race denilaism, equality, Multiculturalism and diversity became methods in which to achieve the eradication of European racial awareness. Western institutions were infiltrated by Jewish academics who employed ethnic networking to get more Jews into influential positions who could then go on to push these pseudo-intellectual ideas not based on science or empirical study, but which were based on achieving a consensus amongst the Western elite and therefore Western civilisation as a whole based on emotional manipulation. Any academic or scientific findings that opposed the Jewish lies were shunned and labeled as 'racist' or 'anti-semitic.' Basically it is a mass censoring of all opposition views, another form of Marcusian Repressive Tolerance, ie no platform for alternative non-conformative views.

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

"The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country."

"We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever."

This ethnic and religious motivation to attack and subvert Christianity goes back to the Bolshevik revolution and the take over of Russia. Jews perceived Russia and Orthodox Christianity as being 'anti-semitic' so set about using Communist revolution to bring down the tsar. Millions of Russian Christians perished as a result. The fact that it was an exclusively Jewish led takeover can be seen in the cooperation between Jewish communists and Jewish capitalist bankers who funded the Bolshevik revolution. Cultural Marxism is merely an outgrowth of this, but uses subversion rather than the gulag and bullet to achieve its aims.

Ivan Aksakov, a leader of Slavophiles in Russia, viewed Jews as a competitive threat intent on destroying Christianity:

'The Western European Christian world will be faced in the future, in one form or another, with a life-and-death struggle with Jewry, which is striving to replace the universal Christian ideal by another, Semitic ideal, also universal, but negative and anti-Christian.'

The following quote shows how at its core the Jewish assault on the West is born out of a deep rooted hatred and fear of Christianity aswel as the European people.

"The Jews emerged from the Middle Ages knowing for a certainty that—individual exceptions duly noted—the worst enemy they had in the world was Christianity: the churches in which it was embodied—whether Roman Catholic or Russian Orthodox or Protestant—and the people who prayed in and were shaped by them. It was a knowledge that Jewish experience in the ages to come would do very little, if indeed anything at all, to help future generations to forget."

- Why Are Jews Liberals? By Norman Podhoretz.

It is this view held by Jews that leads to them supporting all things that negatively impact upon the West whether it be mass non-European immigration, Gay rights, feminism etc. It is as Dr Kevin MacDonald describes it a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy' which is born out of the Jewish intellectual movements of the 20th century Frankfurt School.

The goal is simple, transform Europe and the West into a Jewish construct leading to Jewish ethnic dominance free of European racial awareness, national identity and religious affiliation. It has taken many decades to achieve, but if you look at the West today and are wise to the strategies that have made it what it is, then you will see how successful they have been.

You can also see how hypocrisy is rife in this Jewish Anti-Western, Anti-White and Anti-Christian worldview, as Jews are the most ethnocentric people you could come across. Israel is an exclusively Jewish state that forbids intermarriage and any form of non-Jewish immigration. They oppose gay marriage and have a strong sense of the importance of the Jewish family. All this whilst they support the exact opposite for Europeans in Western nations, and have been at the forefront of promoting for Westerners what they reject for themselves as Jews.

Much of what has happened to the West would not have been possible if it were not for the propagandising of a pivotal 'event' that could be used as a stick to beat Europeans with upon any display of racial, national and cultural pride and awareness.

The Jewish story of persecution throughout the ages at the hands of Europeans and Christians culminating in the so called 'Holocaust,' has become the 'moral justification' for the destruction of Europeans and their ancestral homelands. Any form of nationalistic sentiment is immediately attacked and denounced as 'nazism.' The idea being that nationalism can be stopped by constantly referring to the 'Holocaust' which keeps people from embracing nationalist ideas due to the official 'Holocaust' narrative and the specter of evil that has been attached to it and repeatedly enforced via Hollywood propaganda and education.

Cultural Marxism is the equivalent of poisoning a healthy water supply, it eventually comes to infect everyone with the poison. It is the sabotage of European identity and is a tumour yet to be identified as an abnormal growth within Western civilisation.

The most important thing to know about Cultural Marxism is that it is not a natural phenomena or a natural transition of the thought process of Westerners. It is a deeply hateful, subversive and manipulative ideology employed by a small group of Jewish pseudo-intellectuals and planted into the cultural institutions of the West. From here it has grown like a virus and has come to be pushed by the very people it was intended to destroy. It has been dressed up in words that do not reveal its true intentions. Words like tolerance, enrichment, love, equality and diversity.

The only way to defeat it is to understand that it is designed by a hostile out group to divide and conquer an in group specifically for the benefit of the out group.

Saturday, 27 December 2014

Jewish Involvement In Black Slave Trade To The Americas

By Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael

The following passages are from Dr. Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Dr. Raphael discusses the central role of the Jews in the New World commerce and the African slave trade (pp. 23-25):
During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled husinessmen.
While thriving in Amsterdam - where they became the hub of a unique urban Jewish universe and attained status that anticipated Jewish emancipation in the West by over a century - they began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English).
In these European outposts the Jews, with their years of mercantile experience and networks of friends and family providing market reports of great use, played a significant role in the merchant capitalism, commercial revolution, and territorial expansion that developed the New World and established the colonial economies. The Jewish-Caribbean nexus provided Jews with the opportunity to claim a disproportionate influence in seventeenth and eighteenth century New World commerce, and enabled West Indian Jewry-far outnumbering its coreligionists further north-to enjoy a centrality which North American Jewry would not achieve for a long time to come.
Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seven-teenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.
Slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which as a major stopping-off point in the triangular trade. Both North American and Caribbean Jews played a key role in this commerce: records of a slave sale in 1707 reveal that the ten largest Jewish purchasers (10,400 guilders) spent more than 25 percent of the total funds (38,605 guilders) exchanged.
Jewish economic life in the Dutch West Indies, as in the North American colonies, consisted primarily of mercantile communities, with large inequities in the distribution of wealth. Most Jews were shopkeepers, middlemen, or petty merchants who received encouragement and support from Dutch authorities. In Curacao, for example, Jewish communal life began after the Portuguese victory in 1654.
In 1656, the community founded a congregation, and in the early 1670's brought its first rabbi to the island. Curacao, with its large natural harbor, was the steppng-stone to the other Caribbean islands and thus ideally suited geographically for commerce.
The Jews were the recipients of favorable charters containing generous economic privileges granted by the Dutch West Indies Company in Amsterdam. The economic life of the Jewish community of Curacao revolved around ownership of sugar plantations and marketing of sugar, the importing of manufactured goods, and a heavy involvement in the slave trade, within a decade of their arrival, Jews owned 80 percent of the Curacao plantations. The strength of the Jewish trade lay in connections in Western Europe as well as ownership of the ships used in commerce. While Jews carried on an active trade with French and English colonies in the Caribbean, their principal market was the Spanish Main (today Venezuela and Colombia).
Extant tax lists give us a glimpse of their dominance. Of the eighteen wealthiest Jews in the 1702 and 1707 tax lists, nine either owned a ship or had at least a share in a vessel. By 1721 a letter to the Amsterdam Jewish community claimed that "nearly all the navigation...was in the hands of the Jews."' Yet another indication of the economic success of Curacao's Jews is the fact that in 1707 the island's 377 residents were assessed by the Governor and his Council a total of 4,002 pesos; 104 Jews, or 27.6 percent of the taxpayers, contributed 1,380 pesos, or 34.5 percent of the entire amount assessed.
In the British West Indies, two 1680 tax lists survive, both from Barbados; they, too, provide useful information about Jewish economic life. In Bridgetown itself, out of a total of 404 households, 54 households or 300 persons were Jewish, 240 of them living in "ye Towne of S. Michael ye Bridge Town." Contrary to most impressions, "many, indeed, most of them, were very poor." There were only a few planters, and most Jews were not naturalized or endenizened (and thus could not import goods or pursue debtors in court). But for merchants holding letters of endenization, opportunities were not lacking. Barbados sugar-and its by-products rum and molasses-were in great demand, and in addition to playing a role in its export, Jewish merchants were active in the import trade.
Forty-five Jewish households were taxed in Barbados in 1680, and more than half of them contributed only 11.7 percent of the total sum raised. While the richest five gave almost half the Jewish total, they were but 11.1 percent of the taxable population. The tax list of 1679-80 shows a similar picture; of fifty-one householders, nineteen (37.2 percent) gave less than one-tenth of the total, while the four richest merchants gave almost one-third of the total.
An interesting record of interisland trade involving a Jewish merchant and the islands of Barbados and Curacao comes from correspondence of 1656. It reminds us that sometimes the commercial trips were not well planned and that Jewish captains - who frequently acted as commercial agents as well - would decide where to sell their cargo, at what price, and what goods to bring back on the return trip.
(End of excerpt)
Tony Martin is African studies professor at Wellesley College and has taught at Wellesley College, Massachusetts since 1973. He was tenured in 1975 and has been a full professor of African Studies since 1979. Prior to coming to Wellesley he taught at the University of Michigan-Flint, the Cipriani Labour College (Trinidad) and St. Mary's College (Trinidad). He has been a visiting professor at the University of Minnesota, Brandeis University, Brown University and The Colorado College. He also spent a year as an honorary research fellow at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad.
Professor Martin has authored or compiled or edited eleven books, including Literary Garveyism: Garvey, Black Arts and the Harlem Renaissance, and the classic study of the Garvey Movement, Race First: the Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association.. His most recent book is The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront. Martin qualified as a barrister-at-law at the Honourable Society of Gray's Inn (London) in 1965, did a B. Sc. honours degree in economics at the University of Hull (England) and the M.A. and Ph.D. in history at Michigan State University.
Martin's articles and reviews have appeared in the Journal of Negro History, American Historical Review, African Studies Review, Washington Post Book World, Journal of Caribbean History, Journal of American History, Black Books Bulletin, Science and Society, Jamaica Journal and many other places. His work is to be found in several anthologies and encyclopedias. He has received a number of academic and community awards.
Martin is well known as a lecturer in many countries. He has spoken to university and general audiences all over the United States, Canada, the Caribbean and England, and also in Africa, Australia, Bermuda and South America. In 1990 he delivered the annual DuBois/Padmore/Nkrumah lectures in Ghana.
Professor Martin is currently working on biographies of three Caribbean women - Amy Ashwood Garvey, Audrey Jeffers and Trinidad's Kathleen Davis ("Auntie Kay"). He is also nearing completion of a study of European Jewish immigration into Trinidad in the 1930s.
The Jewish Onslaught
Despatches From The Wellesley Battlefront
By Tony Martin
"...a polemic of the highest order... the best example of an African answering critics since David Walker's Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World." - Molefi Asante, Journal Of Black Studies
"Professor Martin at long last deals with the Henry Gates/Cornel West attacks on Afrocentricity.... Martin provides a solid analysis of the historical use of Blacks by whites to discredit original Black thought deemed unacceptable by non-Blacks....
"I compare The Jewish Onslaught to the classic third chapter of DuBois' The Souls of Black Folk entitled 'Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others....' Martin has written a book that years from now will be considered a classic.... It is simply a must reading on a controversial subject that needs greater airing than some of the more timid political attempts of recent years." - Raymond Winbush, The Voice Of Black Studies
" Tony Martin has been forced to delve into the relationship between the Jews and Blacks and in the process, he has distilled a work that is informative, fascinating and one which will heighten the consciousness of Black people everywhere." - Carl Wint, The Sunday Gleaner
#1 Bestseller
(Your Black Books Guide)
Best Book Of The Year
(Black Literary Awards, 1994)
1993. vii+137pp. ISBN 0-912469-30-7.
Subject: Who owned the slaving ships?
Name Of Slave Ships And Their Owners:
The 'Abigail-Caracoa' - Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Crown
Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson
The'Nassau' - Moses Levy
The 'Four Sisters' - Moses Levy
The 'Anne' & The 'Eliza' - Justus Bosch and John Abrams
The 'Prudent Betty' - Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
The 'Hester' - Mordecai and David Gomez
The 'Elizabeth' - Mordecai and David Gomez
The 'Antigua' - Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell
The 'Betsy' - Wm. De Woolf
The 'Polly' - James De Woolf
The 'White Horse' - Jan de Sweevts
The 'Expedition' - John and Jacob Roosevelt
The 'Charlotte' - Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks
The 'Franks' - Moses and Sam Levy
A video, "The Jewish Role in the Black Slave Trade," a speech by Prof. Tony Martin with an introduction by Hoffman, remains online at Google, as of this writing. Viewers who wish to see it before it, too is censored by Google, can access it here:


Friday, 21 November 2014

AIDS is a male homosexual desease

Source: AIDS Has Become a Gay Male Disease in America


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...